Don't click here unless you want to be banned.

LSL Wiki : energy

HomePage :: PageIndex :: RecentChanges :: RecentlyCommented :: UserSettings :: You are crawl338.us.archive.org

Energy

An object's energy, as reported by llGetEnergy, is quite distinct from the RL physics definition of energy. SL energy is actually a throttle on how effectively scripts can change the motion of physical objects. The energy of an object ranges from 0.0 to 1.0. If an object's energy is 1.0, LSL functions that attempt to change the object's motion will have their full effect. If the energy of the object is 0, the same functions will have no effect. Intermediate energy values give intermediate effects.

An object gains energy through a stipend, which it earns merely by existing in the rezzed state. An object expends energy when scripts call functions to change its motion. SL's energy was implemented to limit the amount scripts can use certain dynamics functions.

Each time an object is rezzed, or its mass is changed (like by changing its size or shape), its energy is reset to 0.

Earning Energy

While rezzed, an object is credited with energy at a rate that is determined by its mass. The more massive the object is, the slower it earns energy. Specifically, the energy stipend is 200/mass units of energy per second. When an object's energy reaches 1.0, the stipend is suspended until the energy falls below 1.0.

Expending Energy

The following functions immediately reduce the amount of energy of the object running the script:

llApplyImpulse
llApplyRotationalImpulse
llPushObject


For the first two, the amount of energy expended is the magnitude of the impulse vector divided by 20,000. For llPushObject, it is the sum of the expenditures due to the two impulse vectors. Note: for llPushObject, the object being pushed does not lose energy.

These functions also reduces the amount of energy of the object being affected:

llMoveToTarget
llRotLookAt
llLookAt
llSetForce
llSetTorque
llSetForceAndTorque
llSetHoverHeight
llGroundRepel
llSetBuoyancy


The amount of energy used by calls to these functions is affected by the mass of the object in question. The different functions also seem to have varying levels of efficiency. Some tasks take more energy for a given mass than others. Persistent functions like llSetBuoyancy and llMoveToTarget constantly use energy and will not function if the mass of the object is above a limit determined by the rate of recharge vs. the efficiency of the function. Smaller objects (those with lesser mass) gain energy quicker.

The energy an object has can be determined by calling llGetEnergy.

Q: Is it by object or by prim?
A: The root prim has the combined energy of all the child prims and its own, as it does with mass. Scripts in child prims will reflect the energy of that prim, same with mass.

A lot isn't known about energy. If anyone has performed tests, please don't hesitate to post more information here.



I've done some experimenting, and energy has far greater effects on scripts. First off, energy potential is based off mass. If the prim has negative mass (LSL mass functions are kind of screwy) then scripts will not run; events won't register (but they will still be shown like for money & touch). If you try and pay an object with negative mass you will get an "out of energy" error box. But, fortunately, there is a workaround for negative-mass prims: make the bad prim the root prim and link in another prim to balance it out. I've concluded the reason scripts don't run (Lindens wouldn't spill the beans when I asked; they told me it was kind of like magic), is that negative-mass prims totally foul up the center-of-mass calculations in LSL and, more importantly, totally do a number on vehicles (I think vehicles are implemented through LSL more then Havok). With some very screwed up prims (don't ask) you can have prims on the other side of the mass equations. The interesting thing is that, under certain circumstances, a prim can be made to shift from positive mass to negative mass and vice versa by manipulating the twist, hollow, top size & top shear. Most interesting is the fact that some combinations of attributes on normally negative-mass prims result in super positive-mass prims. Haven't thought of a good use for them.

On a side note, center-of-mass & mass is used for link distances, not prim size. My findings with prim mass has lead me to conclude that LSL & Havok's mass calculations are done separately (negative-mass objects don't fly into the sky as expected). Will post more when I do the experiments; at the moment I'm trying to keep off LL radar, but I guess I just failed at doing that. :p

SL 1.5 has different rules with mass, and scripts now run in objects that once had negative mass. To read more on this topic read the notes on llSetPrimitiveParams -BW


Functions | Mass | Dynamics | Physics Jasa SEO Murah Jasa SEO Jasa Google Adwords Jasa Adwords Google Adwords Sepatu Safety Sepatu Futsal Cheapes Hostgator Coupon Link Booking Televisori offerte Notebook Offerte Govr Edo Ziedo Portatile Apple RDAnet Lorks Karikatur Bisnis Modal Kecil Bisnis UKM Berita Terbaru Iklan Baris Jasa SEO Murah SEO Indonesia Konsultan SEO SEO Belajar SEO Penumbuh Rambut Kursus SEO Jam Tangan Casio Grosir Baju Bisnis Online Kerupuk Kulit Social Bookmark Kumpulan Puisi WBC Wonogiri Penumbuh Rambut Jam Tangan Murah Jam Tangan Murah Jam Tangan Casio Penumbuh Rambut Kerupuk Kulit Alat Kantor Laku.com Belanja Online Grosir Eceran Murah dan Aman Jasa SEO Model Jilbab Fine Tableware Permanent Hair Removal island investment development professional makeup artist bali private villa sewa mobil jakarta murah Jual rumah Jakarta Contact Lens Technology
There are 3 comments on this page. [Display comments/form]