Don't click here unless you want to be banned.

LSL Wiki : LOD

HomePage :: PageIndex :: RecentChanges :: RecentlyCommented :: UserSettings :: You are crawl423.us.archive.org

LOD


LOD (level-of-detail) is a method of changing something's detail level (hence the name) relative to how far that thing is from the camera on-the-fly (dynamically, real-time, etc). In Second Life, LOD specifically refers to terrain, tree, primitive, and object/avatar polygon complexity. For example, a sphere may be made up of 128 polygons originally but, say, at 10m distance from the camera, LOD will reduce that polygon count to 64 polygons; at 15m, 32 polygons, etc. Avatars have 4 LODs. Given the lack of hidden surface removal (HSR) in SL, LOD is a necessity in order to reduce lag and improve framerate. However, occlusion helps.

LOD also includes texture mipmapping.

SL's preferences has various "detail" options (object, flexible, tree, avatar) that will adjust the LOD limits.

It is the opinion of some, that since SL 1.9.1, the interface options for setting detail preferences has become less intuitive. So much so that they feel it confuses the users.

Links



camera | polygon | land | prim | object | texture | avatar | flexible | occlusion
Comments [Hide comments/form]
I like "obfuscated", BW; please leave it in.
-- EepQuirk (2006-05-03 18:51:59)
You DO understand the meaning of the word "obfuscate" and its relevance to SL 1.9.1 preview's detail options, right? They're confusing; the wording is confusing--it's quite simple logic, really...
-- EepQuirk (2006-05-04 02:13:46)
obfuscate & confusing mean similar things and the way it is currently writen, states it as if it were a fact, while in reality it is an opinion. I was just trying to reconcile the differences.
-- BlindWanderer (2006-05-04 02:52:40)
Um, it IS a fact. If you don't think so, you're on crack, Jack.
-- EepQuirk (2006-05-04 04:07:14)
When you have to link to an offsite dictionary so people will easily understand your sentence... it is time to rethink the wording.
-- ThraxisEpsilon (2006-06-18 05:39:14)
Um, the word "obfuscate" was INTENTIONALLY MEANT to be confusing--just like the detail options are...duh.
-- EepQuirk (2006-06-18 15:05:28)
Word games in a technical reference are a waste of time. The people who "get it" could care less you were being witty. Those who don't just had to link off-site to discover you were being witty. Rather a waste of their time.
-- ThraxisEpsilon (2006-06-18 16:30:22)
I agree. This wiki is a point of reference, and as such, should explain the material within well enough to allow users to understand it without a dictionary.
-- BurnmanBedlam (2006-06-18 16:56:59)
Attach a comment to this page: